Tuesday, February 28, 2012




ලෝක පරිසර විහිළු සමුළු

ගෝලීය උණුසම, මුහුදු මට්‌ටම ඉහළ යැම, හරිතාගාර වායු, කාලගුණික විපර්යාස, පරිසර දූෂණය. ආදී වචන අද වන විට ලෝකයේ නිතර කථාබහට ලක්‌වන වදන් සමූහයකි. ලංකාවට එතරම් හුරුපුරුදු නැති වුවද, ලංකාවේ මිනිසුන්ට එතරම් අවබෝධයක්‌ උනන්දුවක්‌ නොතිබුණ ද සැබැවින්ම එය ලෝකය මුහුණ දෙන විශාල අර්බුදයකි.

කාලයක්‌ පුරා නොකඩවා කෙරෙන පරිසර හානි කිරීම්වල ප්‍රතිඵලයක්‌ ලෙස පෘථිවි ගෝලය උණුසුම් වෙමින් පවතී. පසුගිය කාලයේ ලෝකයේ විවිධ රටවල් මුහුණ දුන් පරිසර අනතුරු එහි ප්‍රතිඵලයකි. අපට ද අධික උණුqසුම් කාලගුණයක්‌, එකවරම අධික ශීතලක්‌ මෙන්ම අකලට මහ වැසි ලැබෙන්නේ ද ඒ නිසාය. එහෙත් ලංකාව ඒ පිළිබඳව උනන්දු වන බවක්‌ නොපෙනේ.

එහෙත් මුළු ලෝකයටම එලෙස කර ඇරිය නොහැකිය. මිනිසාගේ ක්‍රියාකාරකම් නිසා මිහිතලය විනාශ මුඛයට ඇද වැටෙමින් පවතී. ඉන් නිවහනක්‌ අහිමි වන්නේ ද මිනිසාට මය. එනිසාම මේ විනාශය වැළැක්‌වීමට කළ හැකි දේ පිළිබඳව කලක සිට ලෝක මට්‌ටමින් සාකච්ඡා පැවැත්වේ. එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ පරිසර කමිටුව මුල් කරගෙන පසුගිය වසර කීපය පුරාම වාර්ෂිකව මේ සමුළු පැවැත්වුවද එකදු සාර්ථක ප්‍රතිඵලයක්‌ අත්කරගෙන නොමැත. හේතුව හුරුපුරුදුය. ධනවත් හෙවත් කාර්මික රටවල් හා දියුණු වෙමින් පවතින රටවල් අතර පවතින කඹ ඇදීම ය.

ආරම්භය

1994 දී පැවතුණු "මිහිකත සමුළුව" මෙහි මූලික අඩිතාලම ලෙස සැලකිය හැකිය. තිරසාර සංවර්ධනයක්‌ හෙවත් ස්‌වභාවික සම්පත් අනාගතය සඳහා සුරක්‌ෂිත කරමින් සංවර්ධනය කරා ළඟාවීම යන්න පිළිබඳව සාකච්ඡා කෙරිණි. සරලවම පවසතොත් පරිසර සංරක්‍ෂණය පිළිබඳව කථා කෙරිණි. එය ලෝකයේ රටවල් බොහෝමයක්‌ පරිසරය කෙරෙහි ඇස්‌ ඇරවීමට මුල් වූ සමුළුවකි.

එහෙත් පරිසර සමුළුව මෙතෙක්‌ වැදගත්ම සම්මුතිය ලෙස සැළකෙන්නේ 1997 දී ජපානයේදී පැවැත්වුණු කියතෝ සමුළුවයි" ගෝලීය උණුසුමට හේතු වන හරිතාගාර වායු නිකුත් කිරීම සීමා කරමින් කාර්මික රටවල්වලට නිකුත් කළ හරිතාගාර වායු නැතහොත් කාබන් ප්‍රමාණය 2012 දී 5.2 % කින් අඩු කළ යුතුය. ප්‍රඥප්තියේ අන්තර්ගතය එයයි. සංවර්ධන ක්‍රියාවලීන් පරිසර හිතකාමී විය යුතුය. එය 2005 සිට බල ගැන්වෙන ලෙස සකස්‌ කර තිබිණි.

කියතෝ ප්‍රඥප්තිය සාර්ථකද?

ප්‍රඥප්තියේ අවසන් වරට එළඹ සිටින මේ මොහොත වන විට එය කොතරම් සාර්ථක දැයි සලකා බැලීම වටී. කාර්මික රටවල් හෝ වෙනත් රටක්‌ හෝ ඒ පිළිබඳ එතරම් ප්‍රියතාවයක්‌ නොදක්‌වන්නට හේතු තිබේ. තම කාර්මික කටයුතු පරිසර හිතකාමී කිරීමට වැඩි වෙහෙසක්‌ හා අධික වියදමක්‌ දැරීමට සිදුවේ. ඒ නිසා තම ආර්ථිකයට තවත් බරක්‌ එකතු කර ගැනීමට රටවල් කැමති නැත.

අනෙක්‌ අතට මෙහි ප්‍රධානම දොaෂය නම් ලෝකයේ ප්‍රධානම කාබන් මුදාහරින්නෙකු නැතහොත් පරිසර දූෂකයෙකු වන ඇමරිකා එක්‌සත් ජනපදය මෙහි සාමාජිකයෙක්‌ නොවීමයි. ලෝකයේ බලවත්ම ආර්ථිකයට හිමිකම් කියන ඇමරිකාව තම බලය පාවිච්චි කර ප්‍රඥප්තියට අත්සන් කිරීමෙන් වැළකී සිsටියේය. හේතුව ඔවුන්ගේ ආර්ථික කටයුතු දුර්වල කර ගැනීමට ඇති අකමැත්තයි. දැන් ලෝකයේ පළමු පරිසර දූෂකයා වන චීනය ද මෙහි සාමාජිකයෙක්‌ නොවේ. සංවර්ධිත රටක්‌ වන කැනඩාව ද ඉන් ඉවත් වන බව පසුගිය වසරේ අග භාගයේදී ප්‍රකාශ විය. වැඩියෙන්ම පරිසරයට හානි කරන රටවල් එය වැළැක්‌වීමට කටයුතු නොකරන්නේ නම් සම්මුතිවලට එකඟ වීමෙන් පළක්‌ තිබේද?

එසේම මෙම කියතෝ ප්‍රඥප්තියේ අන්තර්ගතයේ ද අඩුපාඩු පවතී. නාවික කටයුතු වලින් සිදුවන හානිය මෙහි ඇතුළත්ව නැත. එනම් නෞකා ගමනාගමනය තෙල් ප්‍රවාහනය වැනි ක්‍රියා නිසා පරිසරයට වන හානිය ප්‍රඥප්තියේ සඳහන්ව නැත.

යුරෝපයේ හා අනෙකුත් රටවල් මීට බැඳි සිටිය ද කැපී පෙනෙන වෙනසක්‌ ලෝකයේ සිදු නොවන බව විද්‍යාඥයන්ගේ මතයයි. ලෝක බල ශක්‌ති අධිකාරියට අනුව වැඩියෙන්ම පරිසරයට කාබන්ඩයොක්‌සයිට්‌ වායුව නිකුත් කර ඇත්තේ 2010 දීය. 5.6% වන එය ලෝක වාර්තාවක්‌ ලෙසද සැලකේ. කියතෝ සම්මුතියට හිමි තැන එයින්ම පැහැදිලි වේ. කෙසේ වුවද මෙය වැදගත්කම වන්නේ සංවර්ත හෝ කාර්මික යම් තරමකට එකඟ කරවා ගැනීමට හැකි වීමයි. ඉන්පසු දිගින් දිගටම පැවැත්වෙන ලෝක සමුළු එකකදී හෝ රටවල්වලට පරිසරය පිළිබඳව එකඟත්වයකට පැමිණීමට හැකි වූයේ නැත.

තව තවත් පරිසරය සමුළු

කියතෝ සම්මුතිය 2012 දී කල් ඉකුත් වන නිසාත් ගෝලීය උණුසුමේ බලපෑම් එන්න එන්නම වැඩිවන නිසාත් මිනිසුන්ට, ලෝක නායකයන්ට නිහඬව සිටීම නොහැකි විය. ලෝකය මුහුණ දෙන මේ දැවැන්ත අර්බුදය ගැන සාකච්ඡා කිරීමට ජාත්‍යන්තර සමුළු ආරම්භ වන්නේ එබැවිනි. මේ වන විට වසර ගණනාවක්‌ පුරා මේවා පවත්වා ඇත. ඒ අතරින් මුල් ස්‌ථානයක්‌ ගන්නේ 2005 දී පැවැත්වුණු මොන්ටි්‍රයල් සමුළුවයි. 2012 කියතෝ සම්මුතිය කල් ඉකුත් වීමෙන් පසු කරන්නේ මොනවාද යන්න එහිදී සාකච්ඡා කෙරිණි.

එහෙත් විසඳීමකින් තොරව නිමා වුණු එයින් පසුව නැවතත් 2007 දී ලෝක නායකයෝ බාලි දූපතේ දී මුණ ගැසුණහ. කාලගුණික විපර්යාස හා ලෝකය උණුසුම් වීම පිළිබඳව විශාල කතිකාවතක්‌ ගොඩනැගෙමින් තිබුණු ඒ අවධියේ බාලි සමුළුව ගැන කාගේත් අවධානය යොමුවී තිබිණි. එය සාර්ථක ගැනීමේ අවසන් වසර ලෙස 2009 නියම කර ගනිමින් ඒ සමුළුවද අවසන් විය.

ඉන්පසු එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ පරිසර කමිටු මගින් 2008 හතර වතාවකට ස්‌ථාන කර හතරකදී පැවැත්වු පරිසර සමුළු නැවත 2009 දී විශාල කථාබහක්‌ සහිතව 2009 දී ඩෙන්මාර්කයේ කෝපන්හේගන් නගරයේදීද 2010 දී මෙක්‌සිකෝවේ කැන්කුන් නගරයේ ද අවසානයේ 2011 දකුණු අප්‍රිකාවෙන් ඩර්බන් නුවර ද පැවැත්විණි. මේ එකදු සමුළුවකදී හෝ වැදගත් ඒකමතික තීරණයකට ඒමට ලෝක නායකයන්ට හැකිවූයේ නැත. අවසන් තීරණය ගැනීම මීළඟ වර්ෂයට කල් දාමින් වසරින් වසර පැවැත්වූ ලෝක සමුළුවල අවසානයේ සිදු වූයේ එය තවත් වාර්ෂික ජාත්‍යන්තර සමුළුවක්‌ බවට පත් වීම පමණයි. මිළඟට ඔලිම්පික්‌ පවතවන්නේ කුමන රටේද, ඊළඟ µsපා හෝ ලෝක රග්බි තරඟාවලිය පවත්වන්නේ කොහේද යනුවෙන් තරගයක්‌ පැවැත්වෙන අයුරින්ම මීළඟ ලෝක පරිසර සමුළුව පැවැත්වීමද තරඟයක්‌ බවට පත්ව ඇත. 2012 වසරේදී ඊට අනුග්‍රහය දක්‌වන සත්කාරක රට බවට කටාර් රාජ්‍ය පත්ව ඇත්තේ තරඟ කිරීමෙනි. ලෝකය මුහුණ දෙන දැවැන්ත අර්බුදය පිළිබඳව හෝ තමන් සිදුකරන කාර්යයේ වටිනාකම පිළිබඳව හෝ මේ ලෝක ප්‍රජාවට කිසිදු අවබෝධයක්‌ නොමැති බව ඉන් පැහැදිලිවේ.

2011 ඩර්බන් සමුළුව

පසුගිය වර්ෂයේ පැවති සමුළු වැදගත්කම අතින් ප්‍රමුඛස්‌ථානයක්‌ ගත්තේ කියතෝ ප්‍රඥප්තියට විසඳුමක්‌ ලබා ගැනීමට තිබූ අවස්‌ථාව බැවිනි. එහෙත් විශේෂ යමක්‌ සිදු වූයේ නැත. අවසාන මොහොතේ කියතෝ ප්‍රඥප්තිය 2013 වන තුරු කල් දිගු කර ගැනීමට එකඟ වීමට නායකයන්ට හැකිවිය. 2020 වන විට නව සැලසුමක්‌ සහිතව ගෝලීය උණුසුමට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියා කිරීමට ඔවුහු පොරොන්දු වූහ. ඉක්‌බිති ඉතා සාර්ථක සමුළුවක්‌ ජයග්‍රහණයකින් අවසන් වූ බව කියමින් මාධ්‍ය හමුවක්‌ පවත්වා විසිර ගියහ. මිනිසුන් විසින්ම සිදු කරන විනාශය වැළැක්‌වීමට පියවර ගැනීම පමා කිරීම දිනුමක්‌ වන්නේ කෙසේද?

ලෝක බලශක්‌ති අධිකාරියට අනුව ගෝලීය උණුසුමට එරෙහිව කටයුතු කිරීමට අපට තව ඇත්තේ වසර 5 ක්‌ පමණි. ඉන්පසු ලෝකය සොබාදහම අදටත් වඩා මිනිසාට දරුණු වනු ඇත. දූපත් රාජ්‍යයන් මුහුදට බිලිවන බවට අනාවැකි පලවෙද්දී සීතල ආක්‌ටික්‌ මුහුදෙන් මීතේන් මතුවෙද්දී කිසිදා නුහුරු දේශගුණික වෙනස්‌වීම්වලට මිනිසා මුහුණ දෙද්දී කිසිවක්‌ නොකර නිහඬව සිටිය හැකිද?

පරිසර සමුළුÊඅසාර්ථක වන්නේ ඇයි?

මනුෂ්‍ය ප්‍රජාව මෙතරම් අනතුරුදායක පැවැත්මක මුහුණ දී තිබියදීත් ලෝකයවට ඒකමතික තීරණයක්‌ ගත නොහැකිව ඇත්තේ තම තමන්ගේ පුද්ගලික න්‍යාය පත්‍රවලට මුල් තැනක්‌ දෙන නිසාය. දැනට සංවර්ධිත මට්‌ටමේ සිටින ඇමරිකාව බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය ඕස්‌ටේ්‍රලියාව, ප්‍රංශය, ජර්මනිය, කැනඩාව වැනි කාර්මික රටවල් ඒ මට්‌ටමට ළඟා වූයේ හැකි පමණ පරිසරය විනාශ කරමින් හා කාබන් නිකුත් කරමිනි. ඔවුන්ගේ අසීමාන්තික ක්‍රියාවන්හි ප්‍රතිඵලයක්‌ ලෙස ලෝකය උණුසුම් වනවිට නීතිය පැනවෙන්නේ සමස්‌ත ලෝකයාටමය. එනිසා චීනය, ඉන්දියාව, බ්‍රසීලය වැනි ශීඝ්‍රයෙන් කාර්මිකරණය වන රටවල් ඊට විරුද්ධය. තමන්ගේ ආර්ථිකය යහපත් වනතුරු ලිහිල් කාලසීමාවක්‌ කාබන් නිකුතුව සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලබාදිය යුතු බව ඔවුන්ගේ විශ්වාසයයි. මේ තත්ත්වයට වගකිවයුතු රටවල් ඊට වන්දි ගෙවිය යුතුය. එහෙත් මෙම දියුණු වෙන රටවල් තමන් අභිබවා යනු ඇතැයි බියෙන් පසුවන කාර්මික රටවල් ඒ අදහසට කැමති නැත. දැන් වැඩිපුරම පරිසරයට හානි කරන කාර්මිකරණය වන රටවල් වහා මෙම නීතිවලට යටත්විය යුතුය. ඒ ඔවුන්ගේ පිළිගැනීමයි.

සෑම වසරකම ලෝකයේ කොතැනකට හෝ එක්‌ රැස්‌වන ලෝක නායකයෝ මේ මත දෙකෙහිම එල්බ ගෙන වාද කරති. ඉන්ධන මහා පරිමාණයෙන් දහනය කරන ගුවන් ගමන් ගණනාවකින් එකට රැස්‌ වී වායු සමීකරණය කළ විශාල හෝටල් කාමරවල නතර වී එවැනිම ශාලාවල දින ගණනාවක්‌ පරිසය සුරැකීම ගැන කතා කරති. චීනය නැතිනම් අප නැති බව ඇමරිකාව කියන විට ඇමරිකාව නැති නම් තමන් ද මේ සම්මුතියට නැති බව ඉන්දියාව හා චීනය ප්‍රකාශ කරයි. මේ මත ගැටුම නිසා එකදු සාර්ථක පිළියමක්‌වත් මේ වනතුරු ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට හැකි වී නැත.

එහෙත් අවාසනාව නම් ලෝකය තම තමන්ගේ සංවර්ධනය පිළිබඳ පුද්ගලික මතවාදවල සිටින අතරතුර ලෝකය විනාශ මුඛයට යැමය. ලෝකයේ අනාගතය තීරණය වනනේ මිනිසුන් අද ගන්නා නිවැරැදි තීරණවලිනි. එහෙයින් පරිසරය වඩාත් දූෂණය කරන පරිසර සමුළු තව තවත් පැවැත්වීම වෙනුවට මිනිසාගේ හෙට දිනය වෙනුවෙන් සෘජු හා දැඩි තීරණ ගතයුතු කාලය එළඹ ඇත. එහෙත් ආත්මාර්ථයට වඩා පරාර්ථය සලකන පිරිසක්‌ ලෝක ප්‍රජාවට නායකත්වය දෙන තුරු එය යථාර්ථයක්‌ නොවනු ඇත.
හසිතා උඩවත්ත

Monday, February 27, 2012


Brandix promotes sustainability at International Youth Forum

 


article_image
S Lanka’s top apparel exporter Brandix extended its globally-acclaimed commitment to the environm
ent to the youth by supporting a forum on the sustainability of the environment, held as part of the first-ever Sri Lanka International Youth Forum of AIESEC, the world’s largest student-run organisation.

More than 40 participants who attended the workshop sponsored by Brandix gained exposure and knowledge of sustainability practices and explored how they are put into practice through a thought-provoking case study, which challenged participants to find creative solutions to implement sustainable practices in a real-world situation amidst constraints.

The case study required participants to come up with solutions conforming to regulatory requirements for energy, water and disposal of waste in a hypothetical scenario involving a proposal to construct an eco lodge in the vicinity of the Sinharaja forest. The participants were divided into five groups and instructed to present solutions within a given time period, for managing resources and disposing of them responsibly during the building and operation of the eco lodge.

Among the issues for which participants were required to find solutions were minimising operational energy consumption, possible alternatives to satisfy energy demand, designing a sewerage treatment plant in accordance with the local environmental specifications and finding the relevant government authorities that approval would be needed from, to proceed with the project.

The Sinharaja forest was specifically chosen for the case study mainly to highlight the Brandix philosophy that like the forest, every inch of land in the world is precious, and needs to be protected with utmost care, the company said.

In addition to the case study, to further the knowledge of participants in sustainability, Brandix representatives made presentations on the topic.

"As a thought and practice leader in the sphere, Brandix is strongly committed to disseminating knowledge on sustainable practices, especially to members of the younger generation, the leaders of tomorrow," said Iresha Somarathna, the Head of Environment & Energy Management at Brandix. "Forums of this nature which encourage knowledge sharing and the participation and intellectual engagement of youth in matters pertaining to sustainability are important for the future."

Apart from the sustainability of the environment, the AIESEC Sri Lanka International Youth Forum themed ‘Diversity towards Development’ focused on several aspects including social responsibility, entrepreneurship, tourism and youth and business. The event was held at the University of Moratuwa and was attended by 300 delegates.

In Sri Lanka AIESEC – Association Internationale des Étudiants En Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (International Association of Students in Economics and Management) is currently present in six universities. Globally the organisation has a membership of over 60,000 students and recent graduates of 2,100 institutions of higher education from 110 countries. The membership comprises of individuals who are interested in world issues, leadership, and management.

Brandix’s commitment to sustainability through eco friendly practices has been recognised with top national and international awards. In 2009, the Group was presented the Energy Globe Award, the world’s most prominent and prestigious environmental prize, for its Eco Centre at Seeduwa. The Group was also honoured with the country’s apex award for energy conservation at the first ever Sri Lanka National Energy Efficiency Awards in 2010. In addition, the Brandix Eco Centre has been commended as a global model for sustainable production by the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and in Britain’s House of Lords.

Brandix was the first apparel manufacturer in the world to receive the ISO 50001 standard on energy management systems for its Eco Centre. In 2008, the Brandix Eco Centre became the first apparel factory in the world to receive a Platinum rating from the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System of the US Green Building Council (USGBC).

To date, four Brandix facilities in Sri Lanka and India have received LEED certification.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Sunday Observer Online


Geo Responsibility Awards on March 15

Geo Responsibility Awards (GRA) 2012 will be held on March 15 at the Water's Edge under the patronage of Environment Minister Anura Priyadarshana Yapa and Power and Energy Minister Champika Ranawaka, Holcim Lanka Ltd. CEO, Stefan Huber said.
He said that the evaluation of industries for "Geo Responsibility Awards 2012" is underway. The GRA award an annual event marks the Geocycle Day to recognise the exceptional efforts by the public and private institutions in the environmentally responsible waste management process.
A media briefing was held last week at the Colombo Cricket Club on Geocycle awards 2012.
Geocycle-Holcim Lanka Ltd. Business Development Manager Randeewa Malalasooriya said that the GRA award ceremony was held last year to popularise sustainable waste management among the industrial community. Geocycle will raise awareness and encourage professional waste management among all industrialists in Sri Lanka," he said.
The Ministry of Environment will oversee the entire process of evaluation and selection for GRA awards. The winners will be presented gold, silver and bronze awards whilst others will be awarded merit certificates for their commitment to professional sustainable waste management, he said.
Geocycle-General Manager Asela Iddewela, Holcim Lanka Vice President, Marketing - Viraj Gunasekera, Holcim Lanka Media and Public Relations Consultant Buddhi Galappatty, Environment Ministry Deputy Director Sustainable Development Padma Abeykoon participated

Saturday, February 25, 2012


IFS Research scientists say

Foresight, forethought and commonsense is needed in fertilizer use

 

article_image
By Arjuna Hulugalle,

Mahatma Gandhi Centre

S. A. Kulasooriya and Gamini Seneviratne, two eminent Research Professors at the Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy said in an interview in Colombo that forethought and foresight is needed on policy related to the use of chemical fertilizers. Possible scenarios in the future have to be anticipated and plans have to be in readiness to meet eventualities as they unfold. "Knee jerk reactions" should be avoided. They are expensive and most often lead to faulty decisions. One should also look for solutions at our doorstep and for local alternatives rather than be influenced by external advice. Commonsense is therefore important in all planning.

Sri Lanka’s chemical fertilizer import bill stands at over USD 29 Million (approximately Rs 33 billion). This figure will escalate with the oil price increase and the worsening situation in the Persian Gulf and also the depreciating rupee.

Apart from the outflow of foreign exchange, the fertilizer subsidy is even higher. The figure for 2010 stood at Rs 65.5 Billion (Source: Daily News May 12, 2011). It is difficult to fathom why basic facts are ignored by policy makers, which will enable the country to cut back on the expenditure on chemical fertilizers. A glaring example is the subsidy on legume pulse crops which are capable of obtaining nitrogen from the air and therefore do not need a government subsidy for nitrogen fertilizers.

Research studies conducted during the past two decades have yielded environmental friendly bio-fertilizers that can minimize the application of imported chemical fertilizers. These local inputs have received no state incentives to popularize their uses and efficacy and to demonstrate the related technologies among the cultivators.

What is particularly worrying with use of chemical fertilizers is that with time degeneration sets in making soils sick and dead. Worst of all, there are very adverse effects to human health and this is becoming more and more evident.

The incidence of cancer and the ‘blue baby’ syndrome has shown a marked increase.

Spread of chemical fertilizers and pesticides since the 1960’s

Years of the extension programs of the Departments of Agriculture and Agrarian Services and the massive advertising done by private sector companies which started with the launch of the ‘green revolution’ in the 1960s have familiarized the use of chemical fertilizers and agro-chemicals even to the remotest of villages.

The two scientists admitted that the high yields obtained from fertilizer responsive new (hybrid) varieties of crops probably prevented food shortages in the past as production levels through traditional methods may not have been able to meet the food demand of an ever increasing non-farming population.

The fact however is that chemical nutrients were added to soils that was under traditional farming. These soils had a build up of organic matter supporting an active population of soil organisms.

Misconception about soil

fertility

The two scientists emphasized that there is a widespread misconception that soil fertility is synonymous with chemical nutrients. Soil fertility is the ability of a soil to support sustainable plant growth and this is much more than supplying nutrients. Besides providing a substrate for the plants to anchor themselves, a fertile soil should have optimal levels of air, moisture, and pH, organic matter (that ensure water holding and cation exchange capacities). Also, most importantly, micro and semi-macro soil organisms that perform functions vital for plant growth.

A fertile soil should be like a moist, soft sponge in which plant roots can grow easily, breathe comfortably and actively and efficiently absorb nutrients which are retained in its colloidal organic matrix.

To illustrate this the scientists drew attention to the lush wet zone rainforests like Sinharaja supporting an above ground, visible wide biodiversity, with its species richness. Though we do not see it there is comparable underground diversity which is a vital component that ensures the health of a soil. These living organisms play a crucial role in the sustenance of chemical and physical factors in dynamic equilibrium that contribute to soil fertility. The continuous application of heavy doses of chemical fertilizers and other agro-chemicals kill most of the living organisms in the soil.

Toxins in the water and USD 23 billion ‘washed down the drain’

The scientist highlighted the alarming situation that soils are becoming sick and die as a result of excessive use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. These soils have low organic matter and little microbial activity. They are unable to retain the nutrients added in the form of soluble chemicals and often less than 30% of the nutrients added are taken up by the targeted crops. The balance 70% is lost.

On an approximate calculation, this means that 23 billion dollars worth of fertilizer imports is ‘washed down the drain’!

What is even more frightening is that these chemicals pollute the environment including our streams, rivers, reservoirs and even domestic wells.

Consumption of such water with high chemical content has dangerous health hazards. Chemical inflows into stagnant water bodies like tanks, ponds, lakes and reservoirs result in eutrophication. This leads to the formation of ‘algal blooms’. A number of these blooms forming cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) produce toxins that contribute to ailments such as liver and kidney failure.

The Institute of Fundamental Studies have recently being doing studies which have confirmed previous reports of the prevalence of toxin producing algae in water bodies of Sri Lanka. The studies have also shown an alarming increase in such populations particularly of Cylindrospermopsis raciborski and Microcystis aerugenosa. This means that on the one hand the government has to spend large sums of money on fertilizer subsidies and on the other hand it has to bear enormous, additional costs for health services as well as water purification.

How can we get out of this situation?

Restore soil health by minimizing the use of agro-chemicals. Bring back the practice of adding organic matter in the form of recycling crop residues, adding animal dung, compost, green manure etc. Depending on the location, type of crop and season, the practices can vary.

Increase in organic matter will automatically bring back the micro and semi-macro living organisms. Unfortunately however, these natural processes require time and this could be a constraint for the realization of large scale production targets of essential food crops like rice, pulses and most vegetables. In other words, it may not be prudent to depend entirely upon organic inputs without any addition of chemical fertilizers.

Organic agriculture alone too expensive

Those who advocate organic agriculture could counter argue this strategy, but up to now organically produced food is costly and a large majority of our population will not be able to afford organically produced food at current prices.

Crop production without any chemical inputs is not the solution and a judicious combination of chemical fertilizer together with organic and/or bio-fertilizers could be the best option.

A step in the right direction

A recent decision taken by the Government to provide fertilizer subsidies only to farmers who apply a certain amount of organic matter to their fields is certainly a step in the right direction. The implementation of this policy should be monitored carefully.

Use of Bio fertilizers tests and the saving of Rs 72 Million already

Novel developments to minimize complete dependence on chemical fertilizers are the use of different types of bio-fertilizers. For leguminous pulse crops, such as soybean, mung bean, cowpea, black gram and ground nut, it is possible to apply rhizobial inoculants.

The Institute of Fundamental Studies (IFS) is continuing a project to prepare and supply such inoculants for soybean at a very low cost of Rs. 300/- a packet that is adequate for an acre of soybean. Use of these inoculants can replace the entire application of urea fertilizer and already some 4,000 to 5,000 acres of soybean is successfully cultivated in this manner (Photo 1). Use of such inoculants is currently saving the country Rs.72 million annually. Research studies to prepare inoculants for mung bean and cowpea are in progress and they should be available in the near future.

Research break-through on Biofilm-biofertilizers

A breakthrough in biofertilizer research came with the development of biofilm-biofertilizers (BFBFs), a technology developed at the IFS for the first time in the scientific world. Biofilm formation has been observed and their potential uses have been reported earlier in international literature. However, the development of biofilm-biofertilizers for targeted crops and the introduction of this term in agriculture are the novel achievements of the Microbial Biotechnology Unit of the IFS.

Biofilms are consortia of different microorganisms such as bacteria, actinobacteria, fungi and cyanobacteria growing together as a community within a common matrix of mucilage. For example, free living rhizobial bacteria do not fix atmospheric nitrogen, neither do fungi fix nitrogen. However, when these two groups are put together and made to form a biofilm some such biofilms are capable of nitrogen fixation in air. This was demonstrated for the first time at the IFS.

BFBFs can replace 50 per cent of chemical fertilizers

The BFBFs developed for tea have been field tested in collaboration with the Tea Research Institute (TRI) during the past six years. Results obtained in the upcountry, mid-country and low country estates show that BFBFs can replace 50% of the chemical fertilizers applied for nursery, young and mature tea without any reduction in the yield of tea. They have also provided convincing evidence that the application of BFBFs also makes the tea plants more resistant to drought, stem borer infestations and increases soil organic carbon which makes these soils more fertile.

Tests with rice, maize, pulse legumes and certain vegetables have also given encouraging results. BFBFs contribute significantly to restore soil health and ameliorate most of the impediments to sustainable agriculture.

The two scientists stated that they would prefer to rename the new input as biofilm-soil ameliorators rather than a fertilizer.

Both scientists felt that the major constraint for the widespread use of these low cost, environmentally benign, indigenous soil ameliorators is the fertilizer subsidy indiscriminately extended by the government to all crops including those capable of fixing their nitrogen from air.




Heritance Tea Factory only Hotel to Win a PATA Grand Award in 2012

 

article_image
Heritance Tea Factory, a property belonging to Aitken Spence Hotels PLC, created by transforming an abandoned shell of a tea factory into a world class eco-friendly hotel incorporating the tea manufacturing culture in its surroundings at Heathersett Estate near Nuwara Eliya will carry a PATA Grand Award when the Pacific Area Travel Association (PATA) meets in Kuala Lumpur in April.

This is the only hotel to take a Grand Award, its owners said.

PATA Grand Awards are presented to outstanding entries in four principal categories: marketing; education and training; environment; and heritage and culture. The other Grand Award winners being the Lao National Institute of Tourism and Hospitality, for Education and Training; Tourism Authority of Thailand for Environment; and Tourism New Zealand for Marketing.

`` Heritance Tea Factory is the only hotel to be recognized as a Grand Award winner amongst 180 entries from 79 organizations world wide at the PATA Gold Awards 2012,’’ its owners said in a news release.

The award lauds the property for successfully transforming an abandoned tea factory building into an eco-friendly, world-class hotel while incorporating the culture of the locality into its operations.

Heritance Tea Factory the highest elevated hotel in Sri Lanka, situated 2 km above sea level was re-branded as a ‘Heritance’ property, Aitken Spence Hotels’ premier brand of resorts in late 2009 after a complete refurbishment.

The idea of turning the tea factory on a hilltop towering over Hethersett village into a hotel was that of Aitken Spence director G C Wickremsinghe. Since it opened in 1996 it has become one of the world’s most unusual places for a holiday where one can truly experience life as it were on a tea estate during the colonial era. This depicts the true essence of a Heritance property where guests are able to experience the locality and community that surrounds the hotel.

"We are delighted to be the recipient of this prestigious award. Heritance Tea Factory has been able to very successfully project its historical and novel charm while still providing exquisite service and a world-class product to the discerning traveler. Receiving this award from PATA reaffirms our stance", said Mr. Roshalal Perera, Executive General Manager, of the hotel.

At Heritance Tea Factory addressing guests’ concern for conserving the environment is paramount. Hot water and central heating are provided by biomass from locally farmed gliricidia wood instead of from atmosphere-polluting, imported diesel while waste and water management is based on sustainable recycling processes; vegetables are organically grown or sourced locally, generating income for the area. Through its Welfare Society, the Hotel sponsors community development projects.

In order for the guests to experience the locality many excursions have been designed incorporating the local culture and environment. Guests can stroll on their own eco walks to explore the locality or join in organised trekking three times a day through the nearby Kudawatte jungle watching for birds and wild animals.

The Heritance Tea Factory experience invites guests to take part in tea plucking and see the tea they have plucked being processed in the hotel’s micro tea factory and have it presented to them in a packet the next morning. Other activities include mountain biking; mini golf; cultural events with the village community; and being pampered in a spa with a stunning view of the lush tea plantations.

"The essence of the Heritance brand is to incorporate service excellence and the local flavour and warmth in every one of our properties. It is overwhelming to be recognized by PATA for practicing what we truly believe in. We have once again put Sri Lanka on the map by being the only hotel to be recognised as a Grand Award winner amongst a multitude of world wide applicants", said Mr.Malin Hapugoda, Managing Director, Aitken Spence Hotels.

Aitken Spence Hotels operates a chain of 25 hotels and resorts in Sri Lanka, Maldives, India and Oman.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012



Tea industry in trouble

 

article_image
By Steve A. Morrell

Although seasonal quality from Western origins were attributable features of Tea sales last week, prices obtained did not reflect quality Teas on offer. Some Westerns attracted good prices but this trend was not sustained as the sale progressed. Brokers reports said the overall average was around Rs. 348. ($ 3.48 approximately), Distinctly recording minus variance of about Rs.45. per kilo.

Dip in prices were attributed to the Middle East Crisis and more to the point was that buyers were now purchasing their Tea from cheaper markets.

Comparatively India was selling at US $ 1.43, Kenya 1.41, Malawi 0.99 (dollar cents), Viet Nam 0.85, Indonesia, 0.58. The question was ‘Who would pay for high priced Teas?’

What of the ‘Ceylon Tea’, Brand, does not that count? They said it did, but not that it mattered when they could purchase what they wanted from cheaper origins.

Brokers said plantations were now faced with additional costs of fuel, price escalation for electricity, and transport. These cost factors coupled with increased wages and depressed crops because of dry weather , further aggravated an already hopeless situation.

Cost of production on Plantations was now approximately Rs. 420. Per kilo. Immediate pointers were that losses were increasing daily, and insolvency was gravely affecting the Plantation sector.

Additionally some estates are facing worker go-slows. Particularly Estates in the Bogowantalawa sub-district. Workers are refusing to increase their out-put further aggravating a bad situation.

Estates reported that pluckers bring in as little as one kilo a day.

Gulf countries including Syria, Iran, the Arab Emirates, continued to be our main buyers. Tea was exported, but they did not settle their bills promptly. This resulted in vicious chain reaction that escalating debt placed Colombo buying sources in tight financial stress.

Expectations were high that after the Presidents visit to Pakistan they would increase their Tea purchases ex Sri Lanka but that was not to be. Pakistan imports of Ceylon Tea was barely sufficient to make even a dent at the Colombo auctions.

Kenya continued to be Pakistan’s main exporter supplying 31.53 % in January this year. India, Viet Nam, Ruwanda, Indonesia, Uganda, Burundi, were all supply sources, exporting more Tea to Pakistan, than Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka exported just 1.30 % to that destination.

Two weeks ago, we concluded an exemplary Tea conference. One that brought to bear a lexicon of outstanding personnel associated with the Tea industry world wide. Chairman Asia Siyaka Brokers PLC Anil Cooke, said ‘ If you’re looking for cause and effect answer you will not get it. What you will have is that Sri Lanka emerged an important driving cog in the global sphere for Tea’.

However irrespective of the sustained power of organizational skills and successful conclusion of the Tea convention, barely a week or two later, reports from Brokering sources, Producers, and Buyers, were not euphoric in content. They collectively said there would be rough times ahead.

We were unable to glean authentic information from the Planters’ Association of Ceylon (PA) on repercussions of the fuel hike which further relegated them insurmountable costs of production.

This week we would have sufficient information on their options to bridge the growing loss situation.

Last week the loss situation exacerbated because of the fuel hike. Many Plantation Companies were loss making entities.

Poaching on massive scale: Lanka can still build sustainable fishing industry

 

article_image
Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing is a worldwide multi-million dollar criminal, destructive, and dirty business, which if left unchecked will continue to undermine the efforts made by coastal states such as Sri Lanka to protect and preserve their marine inheritance. So what can we do about it? What can be done? There are answers, says John Church, an International Fisheries and Maritime Security Expert, delivering a lecture on ‘Protecting and Safeguarding Sri Lanka’s Oceans for the Benefit of the Present and Future Generations’ at the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute for International Relations and Strategic Studies, "The Lighthouse" 24, Horton Place.

It is reported that over 600 foreign vessels are in Sri Lankan waters at any given time.

The text of his lecture follows:

During my lecture I will discuss the benefits of fully integrated VMS, MCS and FMPP programmes. The VMS is Vessel Monitoring System. MCS is Monitor Control and Surveillance system and FMPP is Fisheries Management Protection Programme. The benefits of the implementation of the above programmes include on the technical side: Coastal and EEZ Security, as already explained the EEZ covers the first 200 miles outside the coast of Sri Lanka; Port and Ship Security; Fishery Management, including IUU - Illegal Unreported and Unregulated - fishing and other activity on the sea; Vessel Tracking Systems; Illegal Dumping; and Smuggling. Then on the financial side: Licence Revenue; Attract Inward Investment for Fish Industry Infrastructure; Increased Foreign Market from a Sustainable Fishery; Increased Local Employment; and Ship Supply Services. And finally on the political aspect: the Setting up of Fishery Protection Force; Less Political Sensitivity to Neighbouring States; Opportunity to Cooperate with Other Indian Ocean States for a Fully Integrated Fishery and Security policy; and Support to Sri Lankan Navy and Coastguard.

First of all, who am I and what am I doing here? I am a Fisheries and Maritime Security Expert. My team and I have worldwide experience in the consultation, background research, implementation and operation of VMS, MCS, and FMPP installations worldwide including the UK, USA and the following countries: Cyprus, Republic of Ireland, Equatorial Guinea, Falklands, Ghana, Greece, Indonesia, Liberia, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, St Helena, Sierra Leone, Puntland State of Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, and Yemen.

The EEZ of Sri Lanka is classified as number 57 in the East Indian Ocean. The EEZ is marked in blue; compare that to the landmass of Sri Lanka, and you will get some idea on the benefit and the size together with the value of it. This is more than the EEZ of Iceland, Japan, Myanmar, Malaysia and many other countries’ EEZ. Sri Lanka as an island has over 500,000 square kilometres under its EEZ. It is an extremely valuable EEZ, rich in fish resources both indigenous and migratory and other resources such as gas, oil, and seabed minerals.

Let me just give you some key facts. There is strong international pressure for all coastal states to adopt sustainable fishery policies within their EEZs. Import licences to the valuable markets of the EU and US are not issued unless compliance towards achieving the above principle is in place. As reported in Charles Clovers documentary film, "The End of the Line", unless dramatic measures are introduced to conserve fish stocks the oceans will be mud and water within 20 years. Charles Clovers is an investigative journalist with the Daily Telegraph and what he has stated is not exaggeration but fact.

Fishermen are by nature very greedy people, unlike farmers who give back their soil. The fishermen’s attitude is ‘I’ll catch it now, if not someone else would take it - so I’ll benefit’. I have a copy of this book and if anybody wants to have a look at it after the presentation s/he would be most welcome. You would be horrified by some of the statistics he comes up with.

As it has already been stated, there is no established VMS, MCS, or FMPP in place for proper control and management for the exploration, exploitation, and conservation of the natural resources – both living and non-living – in the Sri Lankan EEZ. Think about that for a minute and think about the impact of not having a proper method to monitor your fishing resources. This has caused difficulties in managing its fish resources, especially in preventing poaching by foreign fishing vessels. The need to do something was first identified back in 1998 - fourteen years ago. Coincidentally, this is when I first visited Sri Lanka to propose implementing methods of FMPP. Progress is now being made which is to be applauded. I think one has to grab the opportunity now and do something about it. Now seems to be the right time with the political momentum prevalent to do something.

Up to 2.4 million people are dependent on fishing and related industries. The EEZ is rich in natural resources including fish, oil, gas, and minerals. The EEZ can supply the nutritional needs of a significant proportion of the population. However, the fish resource is being indiscriminately plundered by foreign vessels. A recent FAO report indicates that up to 17,000 vessels were fishing illegally in Sri Lanka’s EEZ over a five-month period. Imagine that; 17,000 vessels stealing fish that belongs to you. This is a staggering figure.

Illegal, unregulated fishing…

So what is IUU? It is illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing. The definition of IUU is fishing in areas under national jurisdiction without the authorisation of the coastal state. Fishing which contravenes or undermines conservation and management. Failure to effectively exercise the required jurisdiction or control over vessels and nationals, and the failure to fully and accurately meet fishery and fishing vessel data collection and reporting requirements.

Illegal fishing refers to: activities conducted by national or foreign vessels in waters under the jurisdiction of a state, without the permission of that state, or in contravention of its laws and regulations, conducted by vessels flying the flag of states that are parties to a relevant regional fisheries management organisations but operate in contravention of the conservation and management measures adopted by that organisation and by which the states are bound by relevant provisions of the applicable international law, in violation of national laws or international obligations, including those undertaken by cooperating states to a relevant regional fisheries management organisation. There are several of these around the world and are considered comprehensive organisations.

Unreported fishing refers to: fishing activities which have not been reported or have been misreported to the relevant national authority, in contravention of national laws and regulations – of you go out and you catch 20 tonnes of fish and you report only one tonne of fish - undertaken in the area of competence of a relevant regional fisheries management organisation which have not been reported or have been misreported, in contravention of the reporting procedures of that organisation.

And finally unregulated fishing refers to: fishing activities in the area of application of a relevant regional fisheries management organisation that are conducted by vessels without nationality. Flying the flag of a state not party to that organisation or by a fishing in a manner that is not consistent with or contravenes the conservation and management measures of that organisation; or in areas or for fish stocks in relation to which there are no applicable conservation or management measures and where such fishing activities are conducted in a manner inconsistent with state responsibilities for the conservation of living marine resources under international law.

As I said over a five month period there were some 17,000 fishing vessels reported to have been detected in the Lankan EEZ illegally. It is also estimated that there are over 600 IUU vessels fishing at any one time. Some the name of some IUU vessels are covered and there is no ID mark. Both are required under international law but both are sometimes missing from these vessels – because they do not want to be identified.

What are the real-time consequences of IUU? We’ve heard about some of them but let me emphasise them: loss of fish resources, loss of employment, loss of nutritional resources, damage to fertile fishing and spawning grounds, coastal states unable to strategically plan future development of their fish industries, and loss of life - this might sound dramatic but this is quite common in the coastlines of Africa where IUU vessels routinely run down struggling fishermen, and they are left to drown and they disappear to the high seas. IUU is a very serious and a potential catastrophic global problem.

Financial implications...

To emphasise the financial implications: loss of foreign licence revenue, loss of transhipment revenues, loss of landing fees, loss of fish processing revenue - if they take your fish, you don’t own it, you don’t process it, and therefore you don’t sell it to the worldwide market, loss of export markets, loss of foreign currency from exports, loss of tourist revenue – scuba diving, whale watching, and other forms of attraction. Most recently there was a film on blue whales living on the southeast coast of Sri Lanka and attracting quite a lot of tourists. That in itself as Asanga Abeyagoonesekera (Executive Director, Kadirgamar Institute) and I were discussing, needs to be regulated as well.

Other consequences include little or limited checks on smuggling both contraband and people, damage to seabed from the use of illegal equipment - can you imagine illegal dredging for scallops - a similar thing to a farm harrow which is the size of this room being dragged along the seabed damaging everything on its way, reduction in the biodiversity, illegal dumping at sea - there is an example of this off the Somali coast and it was recently reported that there was illegal dumping of nuclear waste off the sea of the Somali coast and we all know what the consequences of that are.

In summary IUU is a worldwide multi-million dollar criminal, destructive, and dirty business, which if left unchecked will continue to undermine the efforts made by coastal states such as Sri Lanka to protect and preserve their marine inheritance. So what can we do about it? What can be done? There are answers.

The first one is the VMS. The Vessel Monitoring system. A VMS will provide co-operative tracking of Sri Lankan vessels - it consists of fishing vessels being equipped with a satellite tracking device hence co-operative. It requires no input from crews nor any training, Communications system – say Inmarsat, but others are equally effective, Control Centre – Maritime Map based viewing station and database Vessel Display units for Catch Reporting, Zone & Alert Management, Weather updates and the Control Centre for up to 3000 vessels is likely to be PC Server based, with Web Access for localised viewing. It can be programmed to automatically warn crews straying out of their own EEZ thereby reducing repatriation costs, which is quite a significant problem between India and yourselves.

The tools for fighting the menace...

However, It must be stressed that VMS is only one of many tools that can be employed.

By itself VMS is not capable of detecting fishing vessels operating without a licence. On its own its of limited value and tells you only where your own vessels are and they are legally operating. So it needs to be backed up by something else. This is an example of how the VMS works (Slide) but as I told you it does n’t tell you where the illegal fishermen are.

A MCS- the Monitor control and Surveillance system takes a wide area view of the EEZ It identifies all vessel traffic in the EEZ, not just those with VMS AIS -Automatic Identification System coastal radar integration and space-based satellite imagery provide EEZ wide intelligence , so you can sit and look and see what’s going on in your EEZ at any given time. Working in conjunction with VMS it can identify vessels fishing without a licence. Vessels with a valid license will come on your screen and those without wont be shown.

However, MCS and VMS combined whilst offering a deterrent to IUU fishermen it has no ability to detain and arrest, The key is to share the surveillance picture with enforcement agencies, patrol vessels - navy, coastguard, perhaps patrol aircrafts, remote Inspectors etc. - you need to include co-operatively tracked vessel data, say from a VMS. You then have a fully integrated approach towards deterring IUU, but as I said you have no ability at that stage to detain or arrest.

This goes one step ahead from the VMS, because it alerts the navy border patrols and other law enforcement agencies.

In a frame [slide], the route of the main trading activity at any given moment is fairly obvious; all the others are fishing boats. And what are they doing? They are stealing your fish. The final part of the solution is FMPP - the fisheries management and protection programme. Without a Fisheries Management and Protection Programme a resource owned by a coastal state will be being exploited at no benefit to itself. Additionally, a Fisheries Management Programme is worthless without an enforcement capability in the form of active patrolling. The state to be fully successful must combine VMS, MCS, and FMPP.

A combined VMS, MCS and FMPP is effectively a ‘spend to save measure’ as it will produce substantial revenue for the government to conserve and manage fish stock, increase protection for artisanal fishermen, and secure designated marine reserves - marine reserves are an important part of the fisheries resources in your island. They are areas designated by the Ministry of Fisheries in which areas there will be no fishing, absolutely none. Fish in these areas recover quite remarkably, if they are left alone. And I would recommend up to 20 – 25% percent of your coast should be designated as marine reserves, where there will be no fishing. Once one area recovers you move into the next area.

A lot of people recommend having fast, big mother-ship to prevent IUU vessels. They are expensive, consume a lot of fuel and are most importantly easily identified. The moment the mother-ship sees an illegal vessel - as much as it moves towards it - the illegal vessel would move away from the mother-ship. Not only could you see him, he could see you, so he drops his gear into the sea and disappears into the horizon. The best method is to have on board the mother-ship, intercept crafts. That way you identify your target and move close to the target in the manner of another fishing boat and surprise him.

Further advantages of a combined VMS, MCS and FMPP programme is that the conditions would require all products to be landed or transhipped in Sri Lanka with preference in license allocation to entities processing in Sri Lanka, so transhipment at sea can be recorded and revenue generated as condition of licence.

A fully integrated fisheries policy also entails investment opportunities - as I just discussed - in fish processing, coastal fisheries, and infrastructure. In fish processing you can have national, regional and export products, and partnerships with national investors for value added product processing and marketing. All this creates employment too.

Then on coastal fisheries: fishing boat construction; fishing operations; sea transport of fish production from landing points; processing centres for national and export marketing; next generation multipurpose fishing vessel design, construction, training of fishermen; establish boatbuilding facility; and establish management systems for vessel operations. As I said the opportunities are endless - the sea transport of fish and marine products; purchase of production in the south and north; transport on ice to processing near Colombo for national and export markets, etc.

Infrastructure: the Harbours at Colombo, Galle, Trincomalee, and Jaffna brought up to EU and US standards for hygiene; investment opportunities in support services at fisheries harbors; fish processing; cold storage; ice; wholesale and retail ideas - that I just discussed -; and fish landing sites with protected berthing facilities and support infrastructure, for example boatyards among a plethora of other options. It goes on and on - everything that is needed to support a healthy fish industry.

In conclusion the fisheries sector is critical to the economy of Sri Lanka. On one hand it is an important contributor to the food and nutritional basket of the country. On the other hand it is one of most important source of livelihoods for the coastal communities. The Schedule of license fees covering all forms of fishing with particular attention paid to the needs of artisanal fishermen who are the most needy out of the lot. They can’t survive if the big boats come and take over their territory, and they will have to be protected. Conformity of fisheries regulations: we need to create a schedule of penalties and fines for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; we need strengthening of national conservation and management; promotion of state flag responsibility; also the accurate and timely catch reports - the bit we have is pretty fragmented; stop the landing and transshipment of fish as a result of IUU; closure of markets for IUU fish - if they don’t have a market where are they going to sell it - this requires global participation; then the requirement of the certificate of origin for legally landed or transshipped fish.

You permit authorized bodies to assess the level of IUU and related activities and implement suggested deterrent measures: installation of Monitoring Control and Surveillance (MCS) systems, utilizing state of the art VMS, operation of inshore and blue water patrol boats, the employment and training of local people as Fishery Protection Officers - that’s a whole new area. Then facilitate the setting up of fish processing infrastructure, process requirements for fish export to the EU and USA and indeed the Far East. Sustainable use of marine fishery resources is highly important for an island nation like Sri Lanka. Good fisheries management practices play a pivotal role in sustainable use of the resources. To achieve this, a sound data collection and analysis mechanism, management planning, regulatory frameworks, and input controls should be in place and operational. In other words a comprehensive VMS, MCS, and FMPP regime is highly recommended. This approach is also supported and highly recommended by the FAO.

Protect ocean resources now, or be done for

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera, Executive Director, Kadirgamar Institute said, "Our EEZ is a potential gold mine, which can contribute significantly to our GDP. Our EEZ, which is 532,619 sq. km, is larger than Malaysia, Thailand and also Vietnam. Our Ocean should be protected for the future generation from IUU - Illegal, Unreported, Unregulated - fishing practices.

"The destruction of coral reefs is already evident; during my time as the Chairman of the Fishery Harbours Corporation, I declared a year to recognize and protect the beautiful corals of the ocean. Protecting our great blue whales, our mammals, licensing whale watching, and more mechanisms and best practices from the world should be considered. Technology has given us ways to understand the nature of our nature. We can monitor and control the fishing in our waters and VMS (Vessel Monitoring System) is a must. The last stock assessment was done more than two decades ago, and how do we know what is underwater if we don’t take a stock take?

Declaration of breeding grounds and embargo on fishing during the breeding period should be considered. Strict and careful quota management of tuna fish should be implemented because of the depleting tuna stocks; we have tuna varieties such as Yellow Fin, Big Eye, and Skipjack in our waters. However there are many solutions available and we need to decide what is best for our country. If we do not set the right standards now to protect our ocean resources, we are undone," Abeyagoonasekera said.